At 6:50 am, she was just outside of Wichita and pulled over to take a pic of the rising run. I fell out of bed when she sent me a pic from her phone. This is real! I mean, I've always believed in the Pole Shift and Planet X, don't get me wrong. But, I have never seen it with my own eyes here at home. This is real. For the first time ever, we have captured the 2nd sun. From our own camera and we see it with our own eyes! It is right to the right of the sun. It no flare. OMG.
İkinci güneş yakalanan yerler ve resimleri
Captured on film at 6:50 am on August 11, 2013 in Kansas. Seen naked eye as well. This image lines up perfectly with the Ecliptic at that date and time, as seen at dawn in Kansas. Gorgeous capture, on the Pole Shift ning and posted on YouTube also, showing that Stellarium does not have any objects capable of being that bright in that place. Skymap confirms this. The excitement both Justin and his mom were experiencing is reflected in their words.
When the sky started to lighten I was traveling west and started noticing the sun about to come up behind me. I passed Towanda, KS and the sky was a brilliant red! I have never seen such a red sky! I am a landscape photographer and of course I had to stop to take a picture! When I looked at the Sun rising the Sun was red, red, red! There was quite a bit of glare but I noticed to the top, side of the Sun it seemed to glare more. I raised my cell phone and it was trying to focus itself. While it was doing that I clearly saw the orb in the screen. It was very clear, separate and apart from the Sun. I clicked the cell and the pic came up instantly! I looked at it and my 1st thought was: "what the heck is that?" Naturally I took another pic and it was still there! I was shocked. I thought "well let me zoom it in as close as possible on my cell phone". My heart was racing and my hands started shaking as I fumbled with my phone trying to get the zoom function working. I finally got it to zoom and click on it again and as it was focusing on the close up the orb was huge! I saw it and almost fainted, my head just emptied of any thoughts at all. I was numb. I took one more with the zoom function. The orb had not moved at all. I was completely shocked. I got back in my car and heart still racing, managed to send the pic to Justin. It was a completely shocking surprise at what I had captured. So that's the whole story.
Planet X is described as being at the 4 o’clock position to the Sun, and if one turns the photo so that the Ecliptic is horizontal (rather than slanting from lower left to upper right) this Second Sun is exactly that. A fan did just that, and there it is, 4 o’clock position.
Mavson'da ikinci güneş
The dramatic capture of a Second Sun arching across the sky was captured on July 22, 2012 by the Ultimate Survival
web site. The Mawson station, an Australian base on the Pacific side of Antarctica, has a cam that shows part of the Sunarc, from the time the Sun is already in the sky until it sets. But something else appears below the Sun, a Second Sun which appears to the right of and below the Sun, setting before the Sun itself sets. If you watch the video, you will see the Second Sun appear low on the horizon, on the right, then set on the right hand side, while the real Sun pops up in up higher in the sky and proceeds to the left, itself to set much to the left.
The Sun is barely over the horizon from the Mawson station, per Safari Plus. The Sun can only be seen from the S Pole region by looking directly North. There is nothing on the Safari chart that could possibly be confused with the Second Sun seen on the Mawson cam.
Frequently when cams show evidence of Planet X, they are moved or disconnected. This happened on May 26, 2003 when Planet X showed up as a Second Sun on the Mount Wilson cam above Los Angeles. After a fuss had been made, as the bright orb is obviously not the Sun or the Moon, the cam was pointed elsewhere at sunrise. UCLA hung a big basketball in front of the cam, with the words “Planet X” written across the face. Read the email conversation below with a UCLA representative as to why the cam was moved, and what it was that showed up in the images. The Moon is a crescent Moon, clearly visible, and the Sun has not yet risen to cast a reflection on anything. Stonewalling emerged. Since the Neumayer station on Antarctica was noted recently to be showing evidence of the Dark Twin, the cam has been draped at night. We do not expect the Mawson station to provide their videos for long, if the Second Sun keeps showing up.
Yes, we get many requests to look at the city lights, so I thought I'd turn the camera toward Pasadena. No other reason.
Would you keep important information from the public if the government told you to?
Depends. If it was truly in the public interest to do so, perhaps I would. Wouldn't anyone? In the case of the Towercam images, there is nothing to tell (or not tell!). The "strange object" that "Misty" seems so fascinated with is nothing more than the plain ol' Moon. An explanation is found here: http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~obs/images/no_planet_x.jpg
How can I buy that theory? How can such a small, dim cresent moon produce a bright, round image?
So I rushed to check the Mawson cam, for captures on July 25, 2012. I found the streaming video of the two days prior again showing evidence of the Second Sun – through clouds on July 24, 2012 and with a distinct pink glow on July 25, 2012. In all cases the Second Sun is appearing in the same spot. These captures show the time stamp, which shows that the Second Sun shows up at 11:20 am, with the Sun overhead at 11:45. This is not the Sun leaping up into the sky. This is a different body.
This can clearly be seen by early July 25 when the Second Sun does shine through the clouds. The location cannot be mistaken. Notably, the video seems to malfunction when the Second Sun was due to bloom on July 25, 2012 and the real Sun rise. The streaming video stalls, then leaps to hours later when the real Sun sets. The site was down for days and then issued a statement “The camera is currently offline. Sorry for the interruption to service … the camera will be back online soon.” We hope this is not the end of data from the Mawson station and suspect the cam will be pointed in a different direction, one not showing the Second Sun, if and when it comes back online.
Those who take the warnings about the pending passage seriously, and who have noted the Moon's orbit to be eccentric and the Sun and constellations not in their proper place long to catch a glimpse of Planet X in the sky, or better yet, catch this on film! Here would be the proof needed to convince skeptical family and friends that a pole shift is in the Earth's future. The elusive Planet X is, however, shrouded by a dust cloud that bounces sunlight back to the Sun, except for those rare moments when the angle of reflection is just right. For those squinting at the sky or peering through dark lens at the Sun, here are some examples of success and failure in the hunt for Planet X.
True Capture: This photo taken behind welder's lens on June 30, 2010 at just one minute shy of 8:00 pm is a true capture of Planet X. This is a sunset photo, taken in Colorado. The line of the Ecliptic, which slants from upper left to lower right, is correct for the placement of Planet X which here appears at the 4 o'clock position. Lens flares in the photo, differentiating the real thing from lens flares, show up in a streak at 11:00 o'clock through to the 5 o'clock position where a line of orbs appear. This photo contains both a real capture of Planet X and lens flares.
Hi Nancy, I recently posted a picture on my page and waited to see if anyone thought it might be Planet X. Would you take a look and maybe ask the Zetas if it is. There is a white speck sitting about 4:00 o clock. Taken using a welders mask at a #13 setting and at the sepia color setting on my camera. If not X, what could it be. Thanks.
Mystery Orb: This photo, taken on July 15, 2010 in South Carolina, turned out to be some sort of bright orb above the Sun at the 11 o'clock position. Moon Swirl orbs do appear around the Sun when the Moon Swirls tubes turn so that sunlight can funnel down them, emerging at the end as though light coming out of a flashlight. They can be quite bright. Here, the photographer is confused about what was captured. But note that another Moon Swirl capture was made just a couple days later in Canada, too.
I'm leary of all the alleged pictures of Planet X so when I took this yesterday morning, I wasn't at all sure about it. I was driving in the car just holding the camera up to the window. … I'm sad. It was just the sun. I got another few pictures today and really paid attention to what I was photographing, and I'm sorry to say it was only the sun behind the clouds. I'm positive the smaller one is the sun. I've taken lots of pictures today trying to recapture it and I'm positive the small one is the sun.
Moon Swirls: Moon Swirl captures frequently go in groups, and can indeed be seen naked eye as this capture during sunrise in Canada shows. This was seen naked eye by the photographer on July 13, 2010 at 6:30 am.
I live in Winnipeg, Canada and am a subscriber to your weekly newsletter. The other morning, on my way out the door to work, I was stopped in my tracks when I noticed something unusual in the morning sky. The sun was breaking through the sporadic cloud cover, and to it's left, I could clearly see a round ball object, that appeared about half the size of the sun. With this strange cloud condition, I could look directly at it(them), without eyestrain, and this formation near the sun was distinctly clear - a perfect round ball. I ran back in the house to get my camera, and a pair of sunglasses, which I shot the photos through. I've taken sun shots before, with and without lens shading, and the glasses seem to help exposure. The photos are not nearly as clear as my naked eye view.
Lens Flare: Even behind welder's lens, a lens flare can occur. Note in this photo, which appeared on Coast to Coast's Photo-of-the-Day, that the photographer is sure he has captured an orb, and feels the orb captured is NOT a lens flare. But the setup he is using shows his assumption incorrect. There are line flares heading out from the Sun at 11 o'clock and 2 o'clock. And that bright orb at 1 o'clock is far too bright to be Planet X, when compared to the Sun, also. Wrong placement too.
I was demonstrating a safe method for looking directly at the sun using welder's glasses. To my surprise, I saw an object next to the Sun. So, I took my digital camera and took a picture of the sun through the glasses. Since the object was visible through the welder's glasses prior to taking the picture, it sure isn't a lens flare.
Three examples of the Second Sun, captured on film, have emerged recently. One, from Sweden, is one the web in a photo album, taken with an HP R707 camera and dated July 4, 2006. A Swedish questioner asks:
Hey I wonder is this the so called sunwheel or is it Planet X and how can you see the difference between these two?
This is not a sundog, a "sunwheel" as there is no halo around the Sun, and there is a reflection on the water from the object. Sundogs are reflected sunlight in ice crystals in the atmosphere that form along a halo line that circles the Sun, often appearing on both sides of the Sun at the same time, with a third sundog possible above the Sun. The point where the sundog touches the halo spreads out along the halo in a rainbow of colors. As the sundog is not an object in the sky but merely reflected light arriving at the eye of the beholder, it cannot generate a reflection on water. The photo, thus, is a genuine capture of Planet X at sunrise or sunset - the Second Sun.A Triple Sunrise Over Gdansk Bay
The second image is from Poland, taken on July 10, 2009, and appearing on the NASA website and in a science article in Buenos Aires. The photographer states she saw this Second Sun with her naked eye, so it cannot be discounted as an internal lens reflection.
August 4, 2009
Explanation: How can the same Sun rise three times? Last month on Friday, 2009 July 10, a spectacular triple sunrise was photographed at about 4:30 am over Gdansk Bay in Gdansk, Poland. Clearly, our Sun rises only once. Some optical effect is creating at least two mirages of the Sun -- but which effect? In the vast majority of similarly reported cases, mirages of the brightest object in the frame can be traced to reflections internal to the camera taking the images. Still, the above image is intriguing because a sincere photographer claims the effect was visible to the unaided eye, and because the photographer took several other frames that show variants of the same effect.
El día que el Sol Mostro 3 soles: Alertan de Nuevas Tormentas Solares
August 5, 2009
El pasado 10 de julio un espectacular "triple atardecer" fue fotografiado en la Bahía Gdansk, en Polonia. El fotógrafo explicó que el efecto era visible a simple vista: una reflexión atmosférica óptica del sol, como si de tres soles se tratara. Aparentemente, el fenómeno llamó la atención de la NASA, que ya ha formulado una posible explicación: el fenómeno se trató de una extraña emisión de plasma solar. Por otra parte, LASCO 3 reportó hoy extrañas anomalías y se preveen nuevas tormentas solares de tipo C, para los próximos días. En concreto hay "alerta solar", para los días 7 y 8 de agosto, por lo que habrá que prestar atención a los patrones sísmicos y a la magnetosfera.
The commentary from posters on the Argentine blog speculate that this is Nibiru or Herbulobus, both alternate names for Planet X. A debate on the NASA blog notes that it is not clear if the photographer took these photos while standing on a balcony, so window reflection might be a factor. Some posters note that Second Sun sightings can occur after sunset if sunlight reflects off the ocean and bounces off the atmosphere to the viewers eye, but these are always verticle reflections, not horizontal. In this case, there seems to be a vertical but primarily a horizontal reflection, above and to the left hand side.
Note that where Second Sun sightings in the northern hemisphere are on the right of the Sun, in the southern hemisphere they are on the left of the Sun. This is because of the way the Ecliptic slants, in the view of those gazing at the sky. To put it crudely, those in the southern hemisphere are hanging upside down, where those in the northern hemisphere are standing upright. Or vice versa. Notice in this example below from Skymap that Venus seems to switch from the lefthand side of the Sun, for Boston, to the right hand side of the Sun for Buenos Aires. This is due to the Ecliptic slant.
Thus, the photo from Poland, and the photographer's statement that she saw this Second Sun naked eye, seem to conflict with what is expected from Second Sun sightings in the northern hemisphere. The Polish photographer offered several additional photos for analysis. What is going on here? The Zetas explain.
ZetaTalk Explanation 8/29/2009: The photos from Poland seem at first glance to be a Second Sun which is a window reflection of the Sun, though there are two reflections, above and below, which would not be the case in a window reflection. In an additional photo from Poland, these Second Suns seems to merge together into the upper left hand side. This is neither a window reflection nor a direct capture of Planet X at sundown, which we have been terming Second Sun sightings. NASA is featuring this photo in an attempt to confuse what they anticipate to be a rash of future Second Sun sightings, the genuine variety caused by Planet X. They are hoping to confuse both the term, "Second Sun" and the placement of the Second Sun in genuine sightings. What was actually captured in these photos from Poland?
This is an atmospheric phenomena caused indirectly by the presence of Planet X, what we have in the past called the Monster Sun phenomena. When genuine Second Sun sightings occur light is bouncing off the immense dust cloud that shrouds Planet X, bouncing at an angle such that the light goes from the Sun to the cloud thence to Earth. A double reflection can occur during such times where the light going to Earth would not be directly into the viewers eyes, but hit water and ice in the atmosphere bouncing yet again at a tangental angle into a viewers eyes. This is what was occurring in the Poland snaps, and yes the photographer saw this naked eye as reported.
A third example was captured in Padua, Italy on August 24, 2009, at dusk. The cameraman noticed an elongated Sun, and stopped along the highway to film it. There is no question about a reflection on a window pane, as cars passing on the highway can be seen and heard. Headlights are mandatory in Italy on such highways, even in daylight. Per the Zetas, this is a moon swirl capture, where sunlight funnels down a moon swirls and is focused and intensified. Moon swirls have been captured in the past, as often as the corpus of Planet X itself have been captured. Examples from 2003-2005 are from China, Italy, andNew York.
Hello everyone fom Fabrizio creator of the video in Padua! I've said previously for my other videos and I repeat once again: to me to be here mingling with Photoshop or anything like that plus I do not even know what they are and how to use them, losing hours to make fake videos to put on You Tube does not interest me at all! I was coming home from work, intrigued by the Sun which was slightly elongated on the right side and I stopped focusing with the camera on the elongation which turned out to be a second small circle! It is a video made in 2 minutes, downloaded to PC via Blue Tooth and on the internet, there are no fake trees made of cardboard or just pixeled Sun or anything else, maybe on a photo I could do it but not on a video for sure, plus I wanted to put music but I didn't even managed to do that! So, if what I filmed is Nibiru, Planet X, the Sun, Mercury, Venus or Mars I don't know. The fact is that the video is true, not modified or anything like that!!
ZetaTalk Explanation 8/29/2009: This video is not a valid capture of Planet X, the Second Sun. It has no obvious flaws, though the quality is poor so details are hard to make out. The Ecliptic plunges from upper left to lower right in Italy at dusk, putting this theoretical Planet X above the Ecliptic and not to the right of the Sun along the Ecliptic as it currently rides. Even allowing for light rays bending to put a placement at a distance, this is too extreme. Then what is it? What could cause an elongated Sun viewed by naked eye, and dual orbs when captured on camera? When Planet X first arrived in the inner solar system in 2003, many of the photos were of the moon swirls, which form long tubes when seen from the side. These tubes focus light bouncing down the tube such that they appear as light orbs when the tube is turned toward the viewer. This focused light, coming down along a moon swirl tube, can be significant and mistaken for the shrouded Planet X corpus itself.